What is the End Point for the UK?

There is clearly a plan, that successive governments are following....

Somewhere in the not so recent past, someone, some group, some authority in the UK decided that the solution to the UK’s longterm problems was mass migration. Initiated during the Blair government, continued under Cameron, then May, Truss and Johnson & now by Starmer, mass, open border migration is the standard protocol it seems.

Not one Prime Minister has attempted to turn a boat round in the channel, not one step is taken to limit migration, to control our borders. Why is that? Why do we have an open border policy?

We are importing large numbers of migrants, many of whom do not share our values or our culture. Cultural change is occurring rapidly across the UK, in every city, every town and increasingly into small village communities.

Who made the decision to change the British way of life, the British culture, the demographic of communities?

There are two issues with the influx of over 10 million people in less than two decades; firstly, as the population has been increased via mass migration we have seen a corrolation in welfare spending which has increased massively. The second is the dramatic increase in violent crime, stabbings and knife use as well as radical extremism from Islamists.

Many of the people we have ‘invited’ to live in Britain do not contribute significantly to the governments coffers, so they are a drain on resources, not a net financial benefit to the country. The consequence is that the standard of living per capita has dropped through the floor. The government will shout about the growth in national GDP, but when divided by the population it is being decimated. So, we end up with a country with many more people in it, where the average contribution in tax is far lower than it was only a few decades ago.

The evidence shows that we are importing too many people that take from the system and not enough that contribute to the system.

This is why our public services are in such a terrible state, why there are not enough houses, why you can’t see a GP, why there are 7 million on the NHS waiting list, why pot holes don’t get repaired, why there are no police on our streets, why our armed forces are severely depleted, why taxes are being increased, why we have no growth.

The powers that be, who masterminded this mass migration solution have failed to understand that all migration isn’t equal. We have taken millions from third world countries, failed countries, war torn countries, and yet, we expect them to arrive here, buy a suit and go work in a call centre. We expect people who failed to build success in their home countries to arrive here and to add to our cake.

This is naive at best, the majority of people take the path of least resistance. They arrive wrapped up in the welfare culture & for most, it is a culture that they will never escape from.

So, who designed this overarching, immovable population explosion, why are the three legacy political parties on board in lockstep?

It would be easy to dive down the WEF rabbit hole at this point and assume that Uncle Klaus is the puppet master controlling all the leaders of the western world, but is that really the case?

Across Europe & America, migration is the strategy, while governments attempt to keep those who object appeased with platitudes, the invasion continues, more boats across the Mediterranean, more boats across the English Channel, millions more entering the US across the Mexican border.

This is policy, this is the plan of legacy government across the western world. It will not stop until the electorate in each country vote for a party that espouses border control.

So, what is the end point for the UK?

Our finances didn’t work when we had a population of 55 million. We rob Peter to pay Paul each month, todays NI contributions paying yesterdays pension liabilities, a giant ever worsening Ponzi scheme, designed to fail, designed to require an ever growing population to kick the can ever further up the road.

Since the introduction of the Pill as birth control in the 1960’s our birth rate has been falling. More and more couples have chosen to have either fewer or no children at all. There is an argument especially today that who would want their children to grow up in the UK as it is today?

The solution made by person or persons unknown is to increase the population by whatever means necessary. They see a larger population as a benefit, regardless of the obvious financial implications. I am sure they must think that at some point, the millions of recent arrivals willl embrace western philosophy, knuckle down, work hard and become net contributors to the British economy.

New arrivals have little incentive to work hard, they are given a roof over their head, three square meals a day, free heating and lighting, a free mobile phone, ready access to a doctor and dentist and some pocket money on a prepaid debit card.

We have a large, out of control jobs black market for migrants, so they can easily earn some cash to boost their income without troubling the tax man.

Quite how we get from where we are now with millions of new arrivals dependent on the state to where we need them to be which is being financially self sufficient is hard to ascertain. It’s going to be a massive achievement which makes me sceptical of any success in this regard in the years to come.

Why does every government trot along with what is clearly a long term strategy, seeming set in stone.

If we want to actually reset the country for the longterm good of every Briton then we need to address the state pension structure. All Ponzi schemes eventually fail. Until we kill the Ponzi scheme and introduce a personal investment scheme that works for the population we will never escape the perceived need for perpetual population growth.

If our NI pension contributions were ringfenced into personal investment funds then not only would we receive a larger pension on retirement, but we would also be accruing a fund of several hundred thousand pounds that would, if required fund our social care.

We could solve many problems if we had a more practical system for retirement savings.

The obvious challenge is how we switch from the current Ponzi scheme to a sustainable investment system? Last year state pension payments were £125B, the year before was just under £119B.

There is a 40 year gap whereby we would need to fund the existing Ponzi system, as well as funding the new investment model. It won’t be comfortable or easy, but it is the only long term way to resolve many of the countries economic issues for longer term prosperity.

If we don’t address the pension crisis, we will see the continuation of the current “larger population good” philosophy. The economy didn’t work with 55 million people, it has got worse now we have hit 70 million people, but still they keep coming as if magically when we hit 80 million, 90 million or 100 million then the economy will suddenly balance itself and become sustainable.

The UK economy will collapse before we reach 80 million based on the current rate of decline.

In 2022 we had 50 thousand doctor shortage and 80 thousand nurse shortage, with 1 million ‘job vacancies’ in total in the economy. Since then, to fix the problem we have imported 2.5 million people gross and yet today in 2024 we still have 50 thousand doctor vacancies, 80 thousand nursing vacancies and 1 million total job vacancies, so the point based immigration system currently used is clearly not working.

Instead of importing doctors and nurses we have imported users of services many of whom do not contribute to the funding of those services. We are witnessing economic lunacy that is unsustainable.

So, who is controlling this lunacy? Who has decreed this mass migration policy that successive governments all seem wedded to?

Our democracy is in tatters, the flaws in the system are plain for all to see but many still refuse to accept the obvious evidence in front of them.

The two party electoral system demonstrates heads you lose, tails I win democracy. Manifestos are fluid and the actual inacted policy is consistent from party to party. We have a Uniparty, devoid of imagination, that has long since given up delivering for the electorate.

Increasing numbers of voters couldn’t even be bothered to vote in July 2024, 40% stayed at home, disillusioned with the process. They have a point, in that election, no insurgent party was going to win, so what is the point?

Going forwards, Reform UK have demonstrated that they can win inside the two party system, a system designed to prevent them from winning, designed to protect the established monopoly, to create the illusion of democracy without actually providing a real choice.

By 2029 at the current rate of Labour lunacy, Reform UK will gain millions more votes. The most important of the five Reform MP wins was James McMurdock in South Basildon and East Thurrock. James was unknown as a candidate, not a known political candidate. James demonstrated that it can be done, it will be done. The only way that the lunacy ends is when the electorate stand up and say enough is enough and vote for the only party committed to border control, to law and order, to national defence, to economic growth.